Neom, Saudi Arabia’s $500 billion smart city, is making waves as a beacon of futuristic living. Marketed as a zero-carbon metropolis powered entirely by renewable energy, it’s being hailed as a revolutionary model for sustainable urban development. But behind the shimmering vision lies a growing debate: how green is it really?

At the heart of Neom lies The Line—a 170-kilometer linear city set to host nine million people, with no roads, no cars, and a promise of zero emissions. This bold idea is reshaping how cities are imagined and built, positioning Neom green real estate as the face of tomorrow.

Yet, environmentalists are sounding the alarm. While the project aims for long-term sustainability, the massive excavation and infrastructure work threaten fragile desert ecosystems and wildlife habitats. Critics point to the irony: can a green city be truly sustainable if its construction leaves an irreversible footprint?

Meanwhile, real estate players around the world are watching with a mix of admiration and concern. Neom offers a case study in climate-forward design, but it also exposes a key issue—sustainability must be measured not just in outcomes, but in processes.

Neom’s vision is ambitious, and if it succeeds in reducing long-term emissions, it could pave the way for similar projects across the globe. But as the line between innovation and environmental compromise blurs, the world is left to ask: can we truly build the future without costing the planet?

Lagos is reimagining what it means to live sustainably by the water, Check this out